New House of Commons Estimates Committee could be 'biggest committee
in town': Minister Don Boudria Meeting six hours a week, new committee
could operate as 'second Chamber,' says Boudria By Bill Curry The
Hill Times The new House Committe on Government Operations and the
Estimates could end up acting like a "second Chamber," says
Government House Leader Don Boudria and the committee's first chair
agrees.
"It could almost be the committee of committees. That would
be the biggest committee in town," said Mr. Boudria in an interview
with The Hill Times. "If all the estimates are reviewed by the
same committee, if a lot of time is spent in there and if they do
careful scrutiny of every single department, or just about, it would
really take on quite a life of its own."
The Government House Leader described the committee as a "second
Chamber" last week during the question and answer portion of
a speech at the National Press Club. Mr. Boudria promised that Parliament
will become more engaged in government policy this fall, thanks in
part to the new committee. He predicted the new committee will allow
for more detailed debate of issues that don't always make it to the
floor of the House of Commons.
The Parliaments in Westminster and Australia have both experimented
recently with a second Chamber that allows MPs to debate issues in
detail that might not otherwise be raised in the main House. Mr. Boudria
was impressed when he visited the one in Britain, and said it looks
more like a committee room than the House of Commons. He said he will
let the committee be creative and experiment with different ways of
doing things.
Liberal MP Reg Alcock, who pushed behind the scenes for the new
committee to be created and is now the chair, agreed with Mr. Boudria's
assessment, promising that it will function unlike any other committee.
The work of the committee will follow the cycle of the estimates,
he said, meaning it will study departmental performance reports in
the fall and the estimates, or blue books, in the spring. Roughly
half of the committee's agenda will be directed by the opposition
and he would like to see a seating arrangement that breaks away from
the adversarial pattern commonly used in other committees.
Instead of plugging away for months on large reports that no one
reads, said Mr. Alcock, he would like the committee to produce frequent,
short reports, perhaps even summarizing every meeting.
Also, to help build a collegial atmosphere, Mr. Alcock is hoping
that the first meeting or meetings in the fall will be field trips
or at least take place off the Hill. When MPs are on trips, he said,
they tend to get along much better across party lines.
The committee will also study and hear from officers of Parliament,
such as the Privacy Commissioner and the Access to Information Commissioner,
as well as the new reports to Parliament from the Ethics Councillor.
Mr. Alcock is also impressed with the calibre of MPs on the new
committee.